642-999 Sample Question

QUESTION: 17

Which two are true concerning authorization within a Cisco Unified Computing System? (Choose two.)

A. A role defines a collection of privileges that determines which actions a user can take in Cisco Unified Computing System Manager.
B. Authorization consists of three components (roles, password policy, and locales) that are based on which features and resources the user will not have access to.
C. Customized roles can be configured on and downloaded from remote AAA servers.
D. The logical resources, pools and policies, are grouped into roles.
E. If the service profile cannot find available resources, it will search in the parent organization for pools and resources.

Answer: A,E

A LOOK AHEAD AT 2017 | What to Expect From Cisco in 2017

Cisco will have a great opportunity to show its networks of enormous strength and move on to the next wave of growth.

Calendar year 2016 was a big year of change at Cisco.

In the year, was not sure how aggressive new CEO Chuck Robbins would be to make changes. Turns, it was much more active you ever dreamed and 2016 will be remembered as the year printed Robbins has the company with his own fingerprints.

During the year that Cisco made several, the most important of which was Jasper technologies. He transformed the Cisco be evangelist of the ITO from year to a major player. We have also seen the company entering the market of analytics with its analysis of fun platform Cisco Tetration.La did not stop acquisitions and product announcements, however.

Cisco has a multi-pronged approach to innovation, which lies well in the future.

2017 will bring even more change:

Cisco has without any doubt a big year of change and hope 2017 to be even larger. Why? Talk to any administration of Cisco and you will say in the digital age, businesses must move with unprecedented speed and be prepared to stop their own markets to thrive. The engine warms up, and here's what you can expect from Cisco in 2017.

Cisco will take a chunk of the security market.:

The security market is easily the most fragmented of all submercados of YOU. There is currently a $75 billion, no sole source contract have share anywhere near double digits. Cisco, in particular, dropped safely for years with various initiatives and architectures that are ineffective.

Today, things are different. As indicated in a previous post, Cisco is not never has positioned the best in the security industry, and the company finally using its assets more importantly, your domain name in the network-to create tangible differentiation. Search 2017 year breaks with the competition and takes a piece of behalf of security.

Cisco breaks away in collaboration:

Cisco collaboration has had its ups and downs over the years, but the high technology company in the right direction. Spark was launched as a soft team collaboration tool, but in reality, it is much more than that. It is a fully integrated hardware, software, and experience of cloud that can provide seamless experiences, easy to use on a mobile phone, office or meeting room. Expect Cisco to continue to innovate in spark and create its next wave of growth in collaboration.

The data center gets a shot in the arm with an acquisition:

The unified computing system (UCS) led to data center business unit in Cisco for years. Recently, however, the growth of the product has fallen. Indeed, this past quarter saw the entry of the data center fall 3 percent.

UCS is a great product, but the computer industry is changing to hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI). Current offer of Cisco, hyperflexion, is an OEM of SpringPath, and channel comments was that they would prefer rather than produces OEM of Cisco. OEM allows Cisco to dip your toe in the water, and in 2017 Cisco will jump two feet with the acquisition of SpringPath, which will stimulate the growth of the data center.

Expect Cisco to focus on analytics:

When we think of Analytics, the Cisco name rarely is head. However, the analytical becomes an essential component of the strategy of Cisco. It is not only the core of the tetration product recently announced, but it is also essential for differentiation of the security company, the Internet of things, network operations and collaboration. Expect to see an analysis more data network to differentiate its many competitors offering more small, which do not correspond to your Cisco footprint.

Cisco will push its engineer base to learn new skills:

The transition of the markets. It is a fact. And when subsequently, engineers who work with the technology must change their abilities. Most of the suppliers do not see the transition, your event is not supported or do not want your base engineer, forcing them to change. And that always ends up being a disaster.

Think of the engineers who work with mainframes, Token Ring, voice TDM, SNA and other trends. Most have disappeared, such as vendors who sell things.

One of the competitive advantages of Cisco is its enormous base of engineers, of which many are immersed in networks was performed. Based on my conversations with executives from Cisco, including Jeanne Dunn, who heads the Group of reflection of Cisco, I think that Cisco wants to interrupt their engineer base and acquire new skills, such as automation, scientific information, programming and business skills. Some people don't like changes in certification requirements, but the fact is that Cisco engineers need to begin to develop skills for the digital age.

Executive churn will slow down:

Given that Robbins took the lead, there was a constant renewal of the level of the Executive, including Kelly Ahuja, Rob Soderberry and the famous group "MPLS", to name a few.

I think the team of Robbins is now. And while there may be the odd result here and there, it is the team that will run with.

A question I ask myself is if the company would replace recently deceased Biri Singh Technical Director Thibault. I think engineering is in good hands which may be under the co-direction of Rowan Trollope (ITO and applications) and David Goeckeler (networks and security), and the structure will remain as it is. Get used to the faces above; You have to stick for awhile...

One thing remains the same in the Cisco is committed to changing the world. Former CEO of Cisco, John Chambers, had a great desire to have the Cisco to make the world a better place. As I pointed out earlier this year, Robbins has picked up the ball of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and runs with it faster than ever before.

The world is increasingly digitized and many of the digital factors, like ITO, of clouds and mobility, are network-centric. This coming year a great opportunity to showcase its huge force of networks and past to the next wave of growth Cisco.

642-999 Sample Question

QUESTION: 16

Which three items represent message formats that are available to send fault data using Cisco Call Home? (Choose three.)

A. short text
B. long text
C. HTML
D. SOAP API
E. XML
F. Java

Answer: A,B,E

642-999 Sample Question

QUESTION: 14

Which Cisco UCS Manager feature allows you to specify multiple LDAP servers for user authentication?

A. Realm
B. LDAP Provider Group
C. Authentication Domain
D. Organization

Answer: B

642-999 Sample Question

QUESTION: 13

Which backup option must be used for a system restore?

A. full state
B. all configuration
C. system configuration
D. logical configuration
E. incremental

Answer: A

642-999 Sample Question

Question No: 12

Which two are true concerning authorization within a Cisco Unified Computing System? (Choose two.)

A. A role defines a collection of privileges that determines which actions a user can take in Cisco Unified Computing System Manager.
B. Authorization consists of three components (roles, password policy, and locales) that are based on which features and resources the user will not have access to.
C. Customized roles can be configured on and downloaded from remote AAA servers.
D. The logical resources, pools and policies, are grouped into roles.
E. If the service profile cannot find available resources, it will search in the parent organization for pools and resources.

Answer: A,E

642-999 Sample Question

Question No: 11

The Cisco UCS administrator has the chassis discovery policy set to "2-link". The administrator connects a new chassis to the Cisco UCS 6200 Series Fabric Interconnects using four links.
Which option about link utilization is true?

A. The Cisco UCS will use two links until the chassis is reacknowledged, after which it will use all
four links.
B. The Cisco UCS will use all four links for discovery.
C. The Cisco UCS will use only two links. The other two links are unusable.
D. The Cisco UCS will use only two links. However, the administrator can manually pin traffic to the extra links by using service profiles.

Correct Answer: A

642-999 Sample Question

Question No: 10

Which of the following is true with respect to hardware failover or NIC teaming within a Cisco Unified Computing System?

A. Hardware failover is specified by the operating system.
B. An uplink failure when using automatic pinning requires that hardware failover for the server vNIC be disabled.
C. NIC teaming is controlled by the vNIC.
D. The hardware failover option that is available for Ethernet does not affect Fibre Channel traffic.

Correct Answer: D

642-999 Sample Question

Question No: 9

Which options are valid port types when configuring fixed 10-Gb LAN interfaces on the Cisco UCS 6200 Series Fabric Interconnects? (Choose three.)

A. monitoring port
B. server port
C. uplink Ethernet port
D. FEX port
E. Fibre Channel storage port

Answer: ABC

Section: (none)
Explanation

Explanation/Reference:
Explanation:

Review: Apple, Cisco and IBM prove that buybacks are a farce

Another benefit season, another load of mass action ads refund. In recent weeks, we have seen:

• $ 4 trillion boost to GM General Motors, + 2.14% -Plan of repurchase, for a total of $ 9 billion.

• A new $ 4 billion repurchase plan MasterCard MA, + 6.71%

• A new share buyback program by $ 10 billion the oil company Schlumberger SLB hit, + 3.97%

Refund amounts are large, and get larger.

"Of the 1,900 companies that have repurchased shares since 2010, redemptions and dividends amounted to 113% of its capital expenditures, compared with 60% in 2000 and 38% in 1990," he told Reuters in a recent special report mania buyback.

You would think that with all this money being rammed repurchase, investors reap the benefits. But, unfortunately, more often, refunds are simply a waste of money that shares are bought at inflated values ​​diluted by awards from employees and ultimately to the detriment of growth and innovation.

Here's why the repurchase are useless and why companies like Apple AAPL, Cisco CSCO -0.57% + 2.96% and IBM IBM, + 2.10% need to wake up and stop wasting your money on the stupidity redemption.

Buybacks Are Often Inadequate

Interestingly, companies often embark on massive buyback plans after seeing tremendous growth, not before. This means they are particularly sensitive to the purchase of shares at a peak.

And when billions of dollars are implemented, paying even just a bonus of 5% or 10% can add up to serious waste.

A good example is Apple, who has tried to appease Wall Street that its growth slowed in 2012 with the announcement of a share buyback plan. And he began this task by spending almost $ 2 billion between September 30 and November 3, 2012, from about $ 80 to $ 90 per share (adjusted for splits).

Apple then proceeded to plant as low as $ 50 in 2013, and not the mark of $ 90 recovered to mid-2014.

Now, the bulls argue that redemption Apple wisely kept the pedal in these depressions to keep buying its shares, which is about half the price of the current action. However, this is not a determined defense of Apple shares rose essentially nowhere since the beginning of this aggressive buyback program; shares are down about $ 90, it was Apple after launching the system back in 2012.

And besides, that includes accelerated action to repurchase $ 6 billion in May 2015 an average price of $ 124.24 - more than $ 7 billion spent in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 for an average price of 124 $ 11 and $ 4 billion spent in the fiscal third quarter of 2015 for an average price of $ 128.08!

That's a premium of 30% of current investors may not see again in 2016 after a rather ugly report first-quarter results.

As you said Warren Buffett in his 2012 letter to shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway: "Decisions to repurchase, the price is very important value is destroyed when purchases are made above the intrinsic value.".

Apple apparently did not get the memo.

Worse than the repurchase by a large bonus however repurchases aggressively and not actually reduce the amount of shares outstanding.

My favorite phantom shares repurchased example is Cisco. Because while the role of the company seems determined to return capital to shareholders, the reality is very different from the narrative.

"In fiscal 2015, we repurchased 155 million of our common stock at an average price of $ 27.22 per share for an aggregate purchase price of US $ 4.2 billion was withdrawn," Cisco said in its annual report 2015, presented in September.

That's great, right? Logically, that means there are 155 million fewer shares of Cisco in late 2014, right?

False.

In fact, on the first page of its 2015 10-K, Cisco reported 5,061,000 common shares outstanding ... everything in its 2014 10-K reports that 5,099,000 common shares - a reduction of about 38 million dollars, which is less than a quarter of the alleged redemption.

In fact, as Cisco based delivery of shares to employees. In fact, the cost of stock-based compensation in fiscal 2015 were $ 1.44 billion.

So if you are one of those suckers who think reimbursements are for the benefit of juice of action, which should be more skeptical of these press releases of Cisco song on the return of capital to shareholders.

I beef with stock-based compensation in principle, since they receive rewards remain loyal, motivated and deliver value to shareholders, but one look at long-term performance of Cisco seems to strongly disagree with this concept.

The Opportunity Cost Is Real For Companies

If you think the examples of Cisco and Apple may not apply to your specific operations, it is useful to consider all waste rescues across the market as a whole.

Consider that Apple spent $ 110 million in a little over three years. It's a truckload of money! In fact, at current valuations, only 36 companies around the S & P 500 would be too expensive for Apple to buy with that kind of change.

And if you do not like the idea of ​​acquisitions, as they tend to be clumsy in themselves, review all R & D personnel or equipment or that kind of money could have been spent.

Consider a recent Reuters analysis, which estimates that IBM has invested $ 125 million in stock repurchases since 2005, but only $ 111 billion in capital expenditures and R & D. It would be good if IBM was on top of his game, but the stock is down 22% over the past five years compared with an increase of 65% for the S & P 500 as income continues to decline and new products can not roll or generate enough quickly enough money to keep the number of contraction Big Blue.

Of course, it is an act of faith to think IBM would have this money effectively. But $ 125 billion is a lot of dry powder, and any target shareholder must admit that the technology giant has not fulfilled its promise innovation and growth for the last half decade.

Refunds come with a high opportunity cost. And considering the above trends often companies buy back shares at inflated prices and then the allocation of shares to offset the cuts, it is not unfair to ask if those billions would be better spent elsewhere.